The concept for the game was good and it played fine, it just needed more polishing. Text wasn't nicely placed, spelling mistakes, too much bevel, and unprofessional graphics. Not that you "need" those things but it would make a much more enjoyable game.
The graphics were done so cheaply and purposely made so simple, that combined with the bad collision detection made the game a pain. This game is a lot like this comic from xkcd <http://xkcd.com/169/>. Acting smugly when "misunderstood" (calling it the world's hardest game, when really it's the worlds most unfair cheap game) isn't a good thing. To make it better, you could possibly make the graphics better (use gradients, add motion blur, make the coins shiny, more creative backgrounds and coloring, etc.). There could also be things like enemies that move towards use, give the player a weapon, etc, etc.
All 2 flash Reviews
Rated 3.5 / 5 stars September 20, 2008
Good concept, needs more polishing
The concept for the game was good and it played fine, it just needed more polishing. Text wasn't nicely placed, spelling mistakes, too much bevel, and unprofessional graphics. Not that you "need" those things but it would make a much more enjoyable game.
Rated 2 / 5 stars April 14, 2008
Not too good
The graphics were done so cheaply and purposely made so simple, that combined with the bad collision detection made the game a pain. This game is a lot like this comic from xkcd <http://xkcd.com/169/>. Acting smugly when "misunderstood" (calling it the world's hardest game, when really it's the worlds most unfair cheap game) isn't a good thing. To make it better, you could possibly make the graphics better (use gradients, add motion blur, make the coins shiny, more creative backgrounds and coloring, etc.). There could also be things like enemies that move towards use, give the player a weapon, etc, etc.
Yes you sure know a lot